[AusRace] Synthetic track stats

[swallis at bigpond.com.au]

Robert,

You might have to clarify that for me if you can. To me it seems half the sires have better synthetic returns and the other half better turf returns. How does that show a bias for or against either surface?  

regards,

Steve


From: Robert Ford 
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 10:34 AM
To: 'AusRace Racing Discussion List' 
Subject: Re: [AusRace] Synthetic track stats

Steve W

 

If you look at the sires who dominate on turf and Synthetic (called all-weather in UK) there are pronounced differences.

The synthetics are far slower, have less traction, have some kickback and are more stamina requiring particularly as they age or rubber /coatings turns to dust/sand particles

 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ausrace.com/pipermail/racing_ausrace.com/attachments/20170316/133dc8c4/attachment.html>