<html><body style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><div>Tony,</div><div><br /></div><div>The spiel I read said it needed IOS - my phone does calls and sms only!</div><div><br /></div><div>LBL<br /></div><p> </p><br /><blockquote><br />----- Original Message -----<br /><div style="width:100%;background:rgb(228,228,228);"><div style="font-weight:bold;">From:</div> "AusRace Racing Discussion List" <racing@ausrace.com></div><br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">To:</div>"AusRace Racing Discussion List" <racing@ausrace.com><br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">Cc:</div><br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</div>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 10:18:07 +0800<br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</div>[AusRace] "Flight" - a system<br /><br /><br /><br />
Previously I posted about "Actons Best", its rules and regulations and the<br />
interference encountered by its author when wearing different hats.<br /><br />
See:<br /><br />
http://ausrace.com/pipermail/racing_ausrace.com/2021-August/001219.html<br /><br />
*This new system "Flight" which has drawings of finches on the cover is<br />
almost the opposite. <br /><br />
Some rules - Flight<br /><br />
The jockey this race has to be different, better qualified.<br />
The jockey can be the same if they have won on the runner.<br /><br />
The distance this race has to be different<br />
The distance can be the same if it won at that distance<br /><br />
*The weight this race has to be different although that is a no or a yes if<br />
it won last start - they write that about the weight change after a win but<br />
the instruction is not mentioned in the rules!.<br /><br />
*The pre-race price (the morning line) has to be 9/1 or longer in any event?<br />
- which gets a mention in the explanation but does not get a line in the<br />
rules!.<br /><br /><br /><br />
MR8 12 Hello Broadcast won - new/different jockey, weight 61.5/58 -<br />
apprentice 3, 1400/1200m, $35 - $23.90/6.40<br /><br />
There is a problem<br />
(a) It doesn't work because<br />
(i) It won't<br />
(ii) It's flawed is so many ways<br />
(iii) I'm doing it wrong(ly) - meaning both, Flight and Actons Best.<br /><br />
Look, I could, and can, cherry pick any number of winners at good prices<br />
(meaning over $4) but the number of non-successful picks between may make<br />
the method(s) unworkable. Or something.<br /><br />
Summary: Actons Best gets its selections from runners that have<br />
characteristics almost unchanged from its last race -so same jockey,<br />
distance, weight. It's as if the team know this runner can do this.<br /><br />
"Flight" gets its selections from runners who have changed characeristics in<br />
its races from last start to this start - so different (better?), weight up<br />
or down, distance out or back. It's as if the team are searching for the<br />
correct elements to allow it to run into the money, and win.<br /><br />
Another way - maybe not<br /><br />
Question - is anybody here using Punters Intelligence data?<br /><br />
Cheers<br /><br />
Tony<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
-- <br />
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.<br />
https://www.avg.com<br /><br /><br />
_______________________________________________<br />
Racing mailing list<br />
Racing@ausrace.com<br />
http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/racing_ausrace.com<br /></blockquote></body></html>