[AusRace] The New England Plus - a system

Thu Feb 25 21:36:39 AEDT 2021

Feel free to crow! Hope you bet.

From: Racing On Behalf Of Tony Moffat
Sent: Thursday, 25 February 2021 11:34 AM
To: 'AusRace Racing Discussion List' <racing at ausrace.com>
Cc: tips at ausrace.com
Subject: Re: [AusRace] The New England Plus - a system

Continuing - no betting suggestions are offered with these - just an
interest until two fail successively and the whole lot get binned - that's
how systemeers operate, isn't it.

1.	The first five in the betting ridden by senior jockeys
2.	The first five barriers, with senior jockeys
3.	The first 5 runners in TAB order, with senior jockeys

It is never going to be 1-5 repeatedly - selections come from those runners
common in each list (the 1,2,3 list)

MRX 5 - (Pakenham) 2,3,5 (4- the spare aka Harry)

MRX 6 - 2,6,5 (4,1)

MRX7 - 5 (11,2,3,6,4,7 - another elimination rule needed)

MRX8 - 6,7,2 (1)

SR5 - (Wyong) 5,3,7 (2)

SR6 - 5, (3,4,9,11)

SR7 - 9,6,4 (14,11)

SR8 - 3,2,1,5

I may result these after - if only as a crow

Cheers

Tony

From: Racing [mailto:racing-bounces at ausrace.com] On Behalf Of Tony Moffat
Sent: Wednesday, 24 February 2021 10:31 PM
To: 'AusRace Racing Discussion List' <racing at ausrace.com
<mailto:racing at ausrace.com> >
Subject: Re: [AusRace] The New England Plus - a system

You are right

Today

MR5, 3,4,2,5 got you 1st,2nd and third

MR6 9,4,10 got you 1st and 2nd

MR7  5,4,2 got you 1st and 2nd

MR 8   9,13,15 got you 2nd and third

3 wins 20/4.60, 3.70/1.90,3.80/1.45

9 places 1.45,2,30,5.50,1.90,2.35,4.60,1.30,7.50,2.20

In MR3 - winner 21/7 - there were two other winners, only R8 failed to
deliver a winner

In Sydney 

winners at 5.50, 2.00, 3.60 maybe, 10.00, 3.50, 13.00

In Perth

R1 - 1st 1.55

R2 - 1st 1.70

R3 - Fail - apprentice rode the winner, system selections ran 2 and 3

R4 - 1st 2.45

R5 - 1st 2.15

R6 - 1st 1.34, a 81 placegetter got a guernsy (maybe)

R7 - Fail - apprentice rode the winner, the same apprentice too

R8 - Fail - winner not selected

These results took me 9 minutes to compile, time is often an element in
selling a system

meaning if it took me 9 minutes then selecting would be a similar time usage
also

cheers

Tony

From: Racing [mailto:racing-bounces at ausrace.com] On Behalf Of L.B.Loveday
Sent: Wednesday, 24 February 2021 12:45 PM
To: 'AusRace Racing Discussion List' <racing at ausrace.com
<mailto:racing at ausrace.com> >
Subject: Re: [AusRace] The New England Plus - a system

19/02 MV

20/02 MR

24/02 SELECTS

Is something missing Tony?

-----Original Message-----
From: Racing On Behalf Of Tony Moffat
Sent: Wednesday, 24 February 2021 15:26 PM
To: 'AusRace Racing Discussion List' <racing at ausrace.com
<mailto:racing at ausrace.com> >
Subject: [AusRace] The New England Plus - a system

The New England Plus - although it has other names, it depends on who is
assuming ownership for this version.

David Glenville, of Racetrack magazine systems fame, claimed it as his at
one time - he was American too, and it was named The Yankee (Doodle Dandy)!

Another was Len Scofer (Dallas Leonard Scofer as named by his parents) Len
was a by-product of Elan School - a tough love place if ever there was one
and had been sent there by NYC juvenile aid groups for behavior moderation.

NYC demanded results too, apparently, a value for money clause. Then it was
named New England Plus.

Closer to home I heard about The Yankee first from my Uncle Eddy, a woodman
from the hills around Canberra but also the Hansard printer most afternoons
and evenings. Eddy had purchased his copy from an advertisement. I have his
copy now. It was the Excelsior Plan then and referenced its origin in New
York with the statement - 'the best there ever was' for winner finding) 

Rules - only senior jockey mounts are considered

(a) Consider the first five in the betting and record their names (or TAB

numbers)

(b) Consider the first 5 barrier numbers, the runners in barriers 1 to 5 and
record their names (or TAB numbers)

(c) Consider the first 5 horses ridden by senior riders - discard horses
ridden by apprentices - in a list of 8 horses, say, runner numbers 1, 3, and

4 might be discarded because they are ridden by apprentices so your rider
list would be 2,5,6,7,8

You now have three lists of 5 runners. 

Look for common runners in all lists. 

A runner mentioned in all three lists is a selection, a runner in two lists
is also a selection.

This, and these, are from the golden age of system selling. No information
or advice as how, why the selection rules were arrived at, just do it and
prosper. Nobody did though.

If there are selections and results here then I used The first 5 in betting
order - off AAP or Rewardbet nominations The first 5 in barrier order The
first 5 horses ridden by senior jockeys -this may NOT be strictly 1 to 5
numerically -see (C) above.

19/02 MV

20/02 MR

24/02 SELECTS

Cheers

Tony

--

This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.

 <https://www.avg.com> https://www.avg.com

_______________________________________________

Racing mailing list

 <mailto:Racing at ausrace.com> Racing at ausrace.com

 <http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/racing_ausrace.com>
http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/racing_ausrace.com

<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_cam
paign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 

Virus-free.
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_cam
paign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> www.avg.com 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ausrace.com/pipermail/racing_ausrace.com/attachments/20210225/255e9863/attachment.html>