[AusRace] FW: Gawler #1
L.B.Loveday
lloveday at ozemail.com.au
Thu Jan 30 09:58:41 AEDT 2020
Thus, before the scratchings, Sportsbetting (I'm not signalling them out - at least they display deductions unlike some others) had:
#3 2.85
#4 19.8
#5 83.0
and after scratchings someone betting before the scratchings would receive:
#3 0.456 (SP 1.16)
#4 3.168 (SP 5.50)
#5 13.28 (SP 16.0)
and someone who put $1000 on at 2.85 would receive $456 if it won (it didn't, bugger).
Not quite the same. INDEED!
Unfair by any rational standard - the only person I can think of who would think it ok is Anastasious Koutsantonis, the moron who gave us the POC tax.
LBL
From: Racing On Behalf Of Robbie Waterhouse
Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2020 17:03 PM
To: 'AusRace Racing Discussion List' <racing at ausrace.com>
Subject: [AusRace] FW: Gawler #1
Rule 2 of Betting used to be, along the lines, ‘if you can’t win, you can’t lose.’
That rule now is: “BR 5.In all bets there must be a possibility of winning when the bet is made.”
Not quite the same.
Rob W
From: Racing <racing-bounces at ausrace.com <mailto:racing-bounces at ausrace.com> > On Behalf Of L.B.Loveday
Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2020 11:45 AM
To: 'AusRace Racing Discussion List' <racing at ausrace.com <mailto:racing at ausrace.com> >
Subject: [AusRace] Gawler #1
From: L.B.Loveday
Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2020 11:38 AM
To: 'AusRace Racing Discussion List' <racing at ausrace.com <mailto:racing at ausrace.com> >
Subject: Gawler #1
Prior to the scratching of #2 yesterday, Sportsbetting was betting 2.85 #3.
28+56=84c deduction, meaning a theoretical return of 45.6c in the dollar if #3 wins. RobW previously posted:
>From Australian Rules of Racing, Rules of Betting
(8) Further provided that, except in the case of a dead heat, no order must be made the effect of which would oblige a backer to receive less than his or her stake.
So it looks to me that the best a person who took 2.85 can do is get his stake back, but only if #3 wins. Does not seem fair.
And what to make of Betfair? 145% deductions? Or maybe I don't understand BF's deductions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ausrace.com/pipermail/racing_ausrace.com/attachments/20200130/2b990c9a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 52345 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ausrace.com/pipermail/racing_ausrace.com/attachments/20200130/2b990c9a/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 28713 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ausrace.com/pipermail/racing_ausrace.com/attachments/20200130/2b990c9a/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Racing
mailing list