[AusRace] The Lachlan - a system

[norsaintpublishing at gmail.com]

Given those recent results. I'm going to have to go back and read the
original post a little more closely.

On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 06:38, L.B.Loveday <lloveday at ozemail.com.au> wrote:

> Tony,
>
> "Is it another way?".
>
> Almost always is another way, so there probably is; maybe even a better
> way,
> but I'm to going to try to think of one let alone suggest one.
>
> Let Grumblebear grumble and Gr8 hate all they like, ignore the
> non-contributing pair and post as you will is what I do suggest.
>
> Regards,
>
> LBL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Racing <racing-bounces at ausrace.com> On Behalf Of Tony Moffat
> Sent: Thursday, 6 June 2019 1:37 AM
> To: 'AusRace Racing Discussion List' <racing at ausrace.com>
> Subject: Re: [AusRace] The Lachlan - a system
>
> I got two off list replies to this post - criticisms, fair enough, ok,
>
> Grumblebear suggests I post the system contenders 10 minutes before the off
> in eligible races.
> Eligible races might be where all have had a start. There is a requirement
> for a contender to have placed 5th or worse last start, whenever that was,
> and is now one of the top weighted runners, with a pre-post price (AAP) of
> 9/1 -$10.
> I won't be doing that.
>
> Let me state that the results I used are after the fact, in fact, after tea
> so well after the race is run and the result known.
>
> Gr8 wrote a few score words (+10) on the meaning of life, mine, and
> suggests
> I am disparaging the system inventor by writing about them after so many
> years (of dormancy or what). It is obvious that Gr8 is not a system
> confrere, he dislikes them, always has, although he uses friendly stats
> when
> choosing a bet, systematically, always has.
>
> I don't believe Gr8 and Grumblebear have ever posted on Ausrace, have not
> contributed anything and not started a conversation.
>
> The author of this system cannot be identified, there is nothing in the
> publication to assist me except the words Pot of Gol(d) and no copyright
> claim of right.
> Pot of Gol (perhaps Pot of Gold) appears unknown. I could get records for
> 'Outdoor' magazine resurrected (the 60's version is now defunct) and
> perhaps
> the advertising department may have a contact name but I won't be doing
> that.
>
> Other system collectors appear not to have these systems, we are a cagey
> lot
> however, but collectors whose knowledge I aspire to do not know either the
> systems or the author. If I thought it was required I would not have
> written
> about the systems, I am down to my last 187 about which I can relate the
> fine details to you, I will, you have years of this yet.  If the author
> permission is required I get it, it has never been refused to this time,
> the
> big add to the knowledge bank was dealing with Oxford University Press (see
> Dettori Day) although not a system it was an education, for me, getting
> permission from them.
>
> Look, I wrote about this system on Tuesday and the first 3 eligible races
> spun up two winners and a placegetter, and 2 unplaced. The winners were
> 13.10 and 14.60.
> Today the first race was a loser,(Doomben R4) but 7 minutes later Gawler R3
> gave us a winner (Slippery Journey $42) Monday we had a loser, then a place
> at 24.60, then a place at 11.80, 3 losses, a place at 17.7 Sunday there
> were
> two places in two races, two losses, then a win at 46.00 Saturday in the
> first eligible race, a win 18.40
>
> Is it another way?
> Cheers
>
> Tony
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Racing [mailto:racing-bounces at ausrace.com] On Behalf Of Tony Moffat
> Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 7:37 PM
> To: 'AusRace Racing Discussion List' <racing at ausrace.com>
> Subject: [AusRace] The Lachlan - a system
>
> The system author published and sold 11 systems - this one was advertised
> in
> 'Outdoor' magazine.
>
> It is similar to Jumping Through Hoops posted here some days ago in that
> the
> runner is subjected to some tests and the qualifiers must pass all of them
> to be considered.
>
> If the runner finished 5th or worse last start and:-
> (i) In the upcoming race it is starting outside barrier 7 (barrier 8 or 9
> etc)
> (ii) It is carrying top weight, or a weight ranked between top and 5th
> ranked inclusive - the first five in the weights I guess
> (iii) It is priced at more than 9/1 pre-post
>
> These tests result in more bets than the first mentioned system.
> The rules can be applied to racing anywhere, not restricted to metro
> Syd/Melb, jumps, maidens etc.
> The naming convention seems to be rivers in NSW, I have posted details of
> The Barwon previously and s/he authored The Hunter, a system for first up
> runners.
>
> Casterton R2 won 13.10
> Wagga R2 place 39.70
> Armadale R3 won14.6
> Armadale R3 place 37.3
> There were losses as well (15)
> The dividends recorded here
> are in races where 3 place divs are possible Armadale R5 place 20.00
> Armadale R6 place 18.90
>
> No, I wouldn't use it to determine a bet but it does show another way
>
> Cheers
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Racing mailing list
> Racing at ausrace.com
> http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/racing_ausrace.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Racing mailing list
> Racing at ausrace.com
> http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/racing_ausrace.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Racing mailing list
> Racing at ausrace.com
> http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/racing_ausrace.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ausrace.com/pipermail/racing_ausrace.com/attachments/20190606/ee9163cf/attachment.html>