[AusRace] off-topic: Any comments? FAMILY LAW

[Thea Boughton]

A serious thought

We realise both parents are needed in the raising of children.

Children raised without a father or stable father-figure with the childs
best interests at hear - those children are indeed missing the affirmation
and love that a father can give.

Fatherless children are incredibly vulnerable. They need to be protected.

There needs to be a lot done to keep marriages and families together.

It doesnt always work out that way for any number of reasons.

Family Law needs to recognise the needs of dads and mums equally.

I sat through a lecture on child abuse recently.  I asked about the effects
of fatherlessness upon the statistics in respect to child abuse.  The expert
lecturing agreed - fatherlessness does contribute to child abuse. Especially
involving third parties who see the absence of protection as an opportunity
to offend.

Fathers need to stand strong and repeatedly lobby politicians, social
engineers, etc to have the family protected through the presence of their
menfolk.

Obviously if the man is going to lose his cool and threaten etc it defeats
the issues of keeping fathers in touch with their children.  Dont get me
wrong - there are some Hagar the Horribles out there too and all of 55kg.

So you men - dont give up on your families - your children need you.

T



2009/6/23 L.B.Loveday <lloveday at ozemail.com.au>

> Never said, suggested, or thought it was. Suggest you read carefully before
> picking fault.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ausrace-bounces at ausrace.com [mailto:ausrace-bounces at ausrace.com]On
> Behalf Of Al Kempton
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 June 2009 2:41 PM
> To: AusRace Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [AusRace] off-topic: Any comments? FAMILY LAW
>
>
> Since when is sex evil? sorry, but I'm not sure it should ever be included
> in the same category as drugs and crime. Then again, I'm a teenager.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "L.B.Loveday" <lloveday at ozemail.com.au>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 1:25 PM
> To: "AusRace Mailing List" <ausrace at ausrace.com>
> Subject: Re: [AusRace] off-topic: Any comments? FAMILY LAW
>
> > Nick,
> >
> > That was enjoyable; the aftermath not so - sicker than a dog. As so often
> > seems the case, God punishes my decadence (picking losers as well;
> > thankfully too ill to be backing them, but the exotics roll on
> downwards).
> > Swine flu from the plane trips I guess.
> >
> > To top it up, just back from school with a sick daughter.
> >
> > Ironic isn't it - the same government that actively encourages the
> > breakdown
> > of nuclear families insists that the resident parent - mother 90(+?)% of
> > the
> > time - works. So I'm ok to pick her up if I'm in the vicinity, but her
> > mother would likely lose her job if she did (forget Labour's laws - they
> > only have useful effect on the wealthy like this morning's headliner, who
> > don't need the money anyway and can get another job). So her mobile is
> > sensibly off when she is at work and she does not provide her work's
> > number.
> >
> > Worse, child-care is out after 11 years of age, mother is at work, so
> what
> > do these kids whose fathers have effectively been excluded from their
> > lives
> > by the evil of the application of FL do? Try sex, drugs and crime. The
> > "success" of the FL and CS Acts in rupturing society is evident
> > everywhere.
> > What else would an sensible person, especially one who is informed about
> > history, expect?
> >
> >
> > L
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ausrace-bounces at ausrace.com [mailto:ausrace-bounces at ausrace.com]On
> > Behalf Of norsaint publishing
> > Sent: Wednesday, 24 June 2009 11:50 AM
> > To: AusRace Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [AusRace] off-topic: Any comments?
> >
> >
> > Didn't think I could add anything to it Len.  It is a no brainer.
> > A diabolical abuse of power by the State, helped of course by the
> > ideological zeitgeist, in part perpetrated and  disseminated  through
> > the media.
> >
> > Don't get me started.
> > Anyone seen my children?
> >
> > How was your tropical getaway?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/24/09, L.B.Loveday <lloveday at ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> >> Nick,
> >>
> >> You passed on Family law (or the application thereof) being evil?
> >>
> >>
> >> L
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ausrace-bounces at ausrace.com [mailto:ausrace-bounces at ausrace.com
> ]On
> >> Behalf Of norsaint publishing
> >> Sent: Wednesday, 24 June 2009 9:58 AM
> >> To: AusRace Mailing List
> >> Subject: Re: [AusRace] off-topic: Any comments?
> >>
> >>
> >> And a very good poke too Alistair.
> >>
> >> A good description of the "media" I saw once was dismissing it as a
> >> giant brainwashing apparatus, paticularly television.
> >> At least with the written word you can mull on it and decide later
> >> whether or not you consider it bullshit.
> >> With the camera manipulating events, that's rather more difficult.  It
> >> looks like reality and is harder to dismiss, despite the fact you can
> >> make a camera do just about anything you want, thanks to splicing,
> >> editing, etc etc.
> >> In fact most of what passes for the news, are deliberately staged
> >> events for the camera's benefit.
> >> Street protests are a classic case. You run into a group of people
> >> aimlessly milling around in the street only to discover they're
> >> waiting for the cameras to arrive to start a protest.  Cameras turn
> >> up, crowd marches around in circle chanting slogans for 10 minutes,
> >> cameras get enough footage and disappear and the crowd then disperses.
> >> Not sure who coined the "camera never lies" adage but think they mixed
> >> up "never" with "always."
> >> It is handy for racing though and would be even better if TVN got rid
> >> of Callendar, Clark, Marshall etc.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/24/09, alasdair kempton <kempton24 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Comments on the media in general:
> >>>
> >>> Look, I'm having more and more problems with the media in general these
> >>> days. The basic problem is, no-one wants news, they want stories. Swine
> >> flu
> >>> has to be a deady killer, the deficet has to doom all australians to
> > third
> >>> world poverty, and on and on. Otherwise, it doesn't sell. The Age, The
> >> sun,
> >>> ABC or channel, 10, it really doesn't make the slightest difference.
> You
> >>> even get the the same stuff on Das Journal (German news on Deutsche
> >> Welle).
> >>> Reporters aren't out to report, because it doesn't get them their
> >> paychecks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On top of all that, they generaly know about as much on what they're
> >>> supposed to be inorming the public about as the average member of the
> >>> public, so the end result is a mass game of chinese whispers played by
> >>> idiots, and fed to us every minute of our waking lives. Excuse me if I
> >> don't
> >>> hold much faith in the media.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> from the age this morning:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> page three, "Delay in testing man who died with swine flu"
> >>>
> >>> The whole article is geared up to attack the standard procedures of the
> >>> hostpital, and re-enforce panic.
> >>>
> >>> Emotive language and appeals to fear work very well. But, does the
> >> reporter
> >>> know anything about medicine? If so, what right do they have to judge
> >>> the
> >>> system?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Also on page three, bushfire stuff. Black saturday was a tradgedy, I
> >> agree.
> >>> But to say that callers were 'abandonded' is ridiculous. You dial 000,
> > you
> >>> have to be connected to an operator. That is so, in an emegency, you
> >>> have
> >>> someone who can calm you down and talk you through the steps you have
> to
> >>> take to protect yourself and those around you. Operators relay basic
> > first
> >>> aid instructions to abulence callers, ect. That means for every caller
> >> there
> >>> has to be an operator. Normally, there is not that many 000 calls, but
> >>> in
> >> a
> >>> big fire (and they pop up once every couple of decades), there will be
> a
> >> lot
> >>> of calls. Without the ability to predict 'hey there will be a fire next
> >>> week', there is no way to make sure that there is an operator free for
> >> every
> >>> single 000 caller in a large scale disaster like black saturday was. If
> >>> you're that concerned, and live in that kind of area, get an amature
> > radio
> >>> operator license, and get a transmitter with a decent range.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I could quite happily spend the next hour dregging up examples for you
> >> lot,
> >>> but I won't. Bottom line: the media is not a tool for informing the
> >> public,
> >>> it's a tool for entertaining the public, usualy in much the same manner
> > as
> >> a
> >>> bad horror movie.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> oh, and as a final comment;
> >>>
> >>> family law might be biased, but it is not evil. There is no such thing
> >>> as
> >>> evil. The world is not black or white, it is grey.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Just my poke.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Al.
> >>>
> >>>> From: lloveday at ozemail.com.au
> >>>> To: ausrace at ausrace.com
> >>>> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:59:19 +0930
> >>>> Subject: Re: [AusRace] off-topic: Any comments?
> >>>>
> >>>> Janet Albrechtsen (the correct spelling is not hard to ascertain) is
> >>>> one
> >>>> of
> >>>> few journalists willing to expose the corrupt, biased evil of family
> > law.
> >>>>
> >>>> Janet Albrechtsen is one of few lawyers willing to oppose the corrupt,
> >>>> biased, society-destroying evil of family law.
> >>>>
> >>>> I need no other reason to support her, and oppose those that don't. A
> >>>> lawyer
> >>>> friend told me I can't be one issue-based. "Can, am and will be".
> >>>>
> >>>> The left's assault on the family is bringing down Western society
> >>>> around
> >>>> our
> >>>> ears while most smugly fiddle. We need more like Janet Albrechtsen.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> LBL
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: ausrace-bounces at ausrace.com
> >>>> [mailto:ausrace-bounces at ausrace.com]On
> >>>> Behalf Of SteveB
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 12:24 PM
> >>>> To: ausrace at ausrace.com
> >>>> Subject: [AusRace] off-topic: Any comments?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Oh well, at least you didn't ignore me this time.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fairfax is not much good either in the news department.
> >>>> ABC is no longer biased left, not since the rodent stacked the board
> >>>> with the likes of Albrechtson or whatever her name is.
> >>>> Even that idiot Abetz acknowledges that, and many left leaning people
> >>>> perceive them as currently leaning right, so maybe they are simply
> >>>> being
> >>>> even handed.
> >>>> And I'm so one eyed I did not vote for them(Labor) last time, nor
> >>>> necessarily will next time.
> >>>> I just despise the alternative with a passion, and News is in the
> >>>> business of propping them up no matter what it takes.
> >>>> They certainly have no 'journalists' worthy of the name, rather they
> >>>> have many biased opinion givers and just plain liars too.
> >>>>
> >>>> Absolutely no cheers to you too
> >>>>
> >>>> Steve
> >>>>
> >>>> John Doepel.................
> >>>> Steve,
> >>>>
> >>>> I think that, if I really was well read, I would be able to retort
> with
> > a
> >>>> comment about "The one-eyed man in the...".
> >>>>
> >>>> I do, however, make a token attempt to go beyond the Fairfax press and
> >> the
> >>>> ABC.
> >>>>
> >>>> Absolutely no cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> John
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: ausrace-bounces at ausrace.com [mailto:ausrace-bounces at
> >>>> ausrace.com] On
> >>>> Behalf Of SteveB
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 9:40 AM
> >>>> To: ausrace at ausrace.com
> >>>> Subject: [AusRace] off-topic: Any comments?
> >>>>
> >>>> Congratulations are due to you John.
> >>>> You have convinced me that this rag has at least one reader more than
> I
> >>>> thought it did, and deserves to have.
> >>>> And you pay for this bible of truth? Remarkable.
> >>>> News Ltd credibility is in tatters as most people already knew, but
> > those
> >>>> that needed convincing, have the last few days to prove it beyond
> >>>> doubt.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> John Doepel......
> >>>> Very interesting opinion piece in today's Australian - "Reason
> cloudded
> >> by
> >>>> carbon emissions" - or similar. Should be online.
> >>>>
> >>>> Suggests that carbon particulate matter from coal-fired power stations
> >>>> causes lack of rain. That CO2 irrelevant.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> John
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> AusRace mailing list
> >>>> AusRace at ausrace.com
> >>>> http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/ausrace
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> AusRace mailing list
> >>>> AusRace at ausrace.com
> >>>> http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/ausrace
> >>>
> >>> _________________________________________________________________
> >>> Looking for a new car this winter? Let us help with car news, reviews
> >>> and
> >>> more
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fsecure%2Dau%2Eimrworldwide%2
> >>
> >
>
> Ecom%2Fcgi%2Dbin%2Fa%2Fci%5F450304%2Fet%5F2%2Fcg%5F801459%2Fpi%5F1004813%2Fa
> >> i%5F859641&_t=762955845&_r=tig_OCT07&_m=EXT
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> AusRace mailing list
> >>> AusRace at ausrace.com
> >>> http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/ausrace
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AusRace mailing list
> >> AusRace at ausrace.com
> >> http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/ausrace
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AusRace mailing list
> >> AusRace at ausrace.com
> >> http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/ausrace
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > AusRace mailing list
> > AusRace at ausrace.com
> > http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/ausrace
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AusRace mailing list
> > AusRace at ausrace.com
> > http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/ausrace
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AusRace mailing list
> AusRace at ausrace.com
> http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/ausrace
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusRace mailing list
> AusRace at ausrace.com
> http://ausrace.com/mailman/listinfo/ausrace
>